This was the one news source that I read regularly in high school, because my mom said I had to if I wanted to go to an Ivy League college. It was pretty good and I liked the pictures.
Recently I picked up an issue that was sitting on my parents' kitchen table, and the thing had shrunken to the size of a pamphlet. It was like meeting Ryan Gosling (who is medium-hot) and he opened up his pants to show you his small, flaccid penis. It was that sad.
I know some people have issues with newspapers and magazines going online, but have you tried to read the print edition of the NY Times? I would only buy it if it came with a free arm. Sorry but I don't want to carry 10 lbs of recycling, most of which I am not planning to read anyway.
Going online is the way to go. It's a more efficient and less costly way of distributing content. People can "share" and "like" things. Your fingers are not stained black and you will never have a "eat Cheetos or read the paper" dilemma again.
So, in conclusion, putting your content online avoids the problem of small, flaccid penis. I think I summarized that right.
** Edited to add a picture, because pictures make everything better:
"Please, honey, it can get this big when I want it to."
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone
erm i should know this since i work in publishing...but i did not.
ReplyDeleteat first i thought you were referring to knowing about penis...but unfortunately you were not.
Delete